<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bernie at the Helm</title>
	<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/</link>
	<description>Contract Bridge Themes with a Midwest Accent!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bernie miller</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-64</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-64</guid>
					<description>opening lead was C8, very unusual lead on this auction. lead &#38; auction convinced me to take line of ruffing 2d's in dummy rather than play for clubs no worse than 4-2. fortunately for our side this line worked (c's were 5-1)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>opening lead was C8, very unusual lead on this auction. lead &amp; auction convinced me to take line of ruffing 2d&#8217;s in dummy rather than play for clubs no worse than 4-2. fortunately for our side this line worked (c&#8217;s were 5-1)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil Warden</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-63</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-63</guid>
					<description>In a situation like this where both 5NT and 6H show the Q of trump, and we believe it likely that we have an 8 card fit, my partner and I use 5NT to show the Q and the J. This is another variation of what I for fun have named 'the Jackass convention.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a situation like this where both 5NT and 6H show the Q of trump, and we believe it likely that we have an 8 card fit, my partner and I use 5NT to show the Q and the J. This is another variation of what I for fun have named &#8216;the Jackass convention.&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-62</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-62</guid>
					<description>Important addendum to Jack's line B: When you discover that's righty has five clubs and three trumps, you're in a position to make it whenever he is 3-3-2-5, by just eloping with your top tricks and all your little trumps. He will follow suit helplessly to all 13 tricks.

On the other hand: if you had cashed one high trump in each hand (B') it could make it when he is 2-3-3-5: you have just enough entries to take two diamond ruffs and pull his trump before scoring the third spade.

The second distribution is mathematically more likely by 6:5, but I would trust the bidding just enough to prefer Jack's original line B. I also trust enough to prefer B to A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important addendum to Jack&#8217;s line B: When you discover that&#8217;s righty has five clubs and three trumps, you&#8217;re in a position to make it whenever he is 3-3-2-5, by just eloping with your top tricks and all your little trumps. He will follow suit helplessly to all 13 tricks.</p>
<p>On the other hand: if you had cashed one high trump in each hand (B&#8217;) it could make it when he is 2-3-3-5: you have just enough entries to take two diamond ruffs and pull his trump before scoring the third spade.</p>
<p>The second distribution is mathematically more likely by 6:5, but I would trust the bidding just enough to prefer Jack&#8217;s original line B. I also trust enough to prefer B to A.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Oest</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-61</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-61</guid>
					<description>I'm not sure what is best here:

Line A: Win the (spade?) in hand, play ace and ruff a diamond, now two rounds of trumps ending in hand, then a second diamond ruff. Now back tohand in clubs and claim. This makes as long as diamonds are not 6-2 at my left or, if they are, if LHO has the third trump.

Line B: Win the (spade?) in hand. Cash two high trumps in your hand, unblock the clubs, then over to the ace ofhearts. If clubs are 4-2 you are cold, if they are 5-1, you are probably down right now unless LHO has the five clubs + the third trump. But in that case you probably can't get back over to dummy for your minor suit squeeze unless he was 2-3-3-5 with the diamond king -- an obscure layout.

If clubs are 5-1 but RHO has the five clubs plus the third trump, it's hard to see how to avoid taking the presumably losing diamond finesse.

I vote for Line A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what is best here:</p>
<p>Line A: Win the (spade?) in hand, play ace and ruff a diamond, now two rounds of trumps ending in hand, then a second diamond ruff. Now back tohand in clubs and claim. This makes as long as diamonds are not 6-2 at my left or, if they are, if LHO has the third trump.</p>
<p>Line B: Win the (spade?) in hand. Cash two high trumps in your hand, unblock the clubs, then over to the ace ofhearts. If clubs are 4-2 you are cold, if they are 5-1, you are probably down right now unless LHO has the five clubs + the third trump. But in that case you probably can&#8217;t get back over to dummy for your minor suit squeeze unless he was 2-3-3-5 with the diamond king &#8212; an obscure layout.</p>
<p>If clubs are 5-1 but RHO has the five clubs plus the third trump, it&#8217;s hard to see how to avoid taking the presumably losing diamond finesse.</p>
<p>I vote for Line A.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sam</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-60</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/22/bernie-at-the-helm/#comment-60</guid>
					<description>I think that it is unlikely in the extreme that LHO holds KJ sixth of D and failed to bid over 2C, instead opting to direct his own lead with a x. Instead, he probably has 5 diam or 6 weak and is hoping partner can find the save. That increases the likelihood of shortness elsewhere in the hand. Therefore, I would try A of D and a rough and if no honor appeared, would draw 2 rounds of trump and try a second rough. If an honor did appear, I would switch to clubs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is unlikely in the extreme that LHO holds KJ sixth of D and failed to bid over 2C, instead opting to direct his own lead with a x. Instead, he probably has 5 diam or 6 weak and is hoping partner can find the save. That increases the likelihood of shortness elsewhere in the hand. Therefore, I would try A of D and a rough and if no honor appeared, would draw 2 rounds of trump and try a second rough. If an honor did appear, I would switch to clubs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
