<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interesting Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/</link>
	<description>Contract Bridge Themes with a Midwest Accent!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie miller</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>bernie miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>with the actual hand, i would start with 3h, then bid 5s unless pard does something unexpected in clubs or maybe d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with the actual hand, i would start with 3h, then bid 5s unless pard does something unexpected in clubs or maybe d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Warden</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Warden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jeff&#039;s proposed rules and like Wickham&#039;s 5N bid as well. It sounds like Doc will want to play like this with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jeff&#8217;s proposed rules and like Wickham&#8217;s 5N bid as well. It sounds like Doc will want to play like this with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>i agree with jeff but plan to discuss with my partner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with jeff but plan to discuss with my partner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie miller</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>bernie miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m confused. isn&#039;t this same as if pard opened 5s with a solid hand missing A &amp; K of spades? i have neither so i pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m confused. isn&#8217;t this same as if pard opened 5s with a solid hand missing A &amp; K of spades? i have neither so i pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Warden</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Warden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/26/an-interesting-problem/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>When I gave the auction to my partner without a hand, she said it was quantitative with me but asking for a heart control with everyone else. It is a lot more useful quantitative with no control problems, especially when further preemption is likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I gave the auction to my partner without a hand, she said it was quantitative with me but asking for a heart control with everyone else. It is a lot more useful quantitative with no control problems, especially when further preemption is likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

