<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flader Having Fun?</title>
	<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/31/flader-having-fun/</link>
	<description>Contract Bridge Themes with a Midwest Accent!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: M Huston</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/31/flader-having-fun/#comment-124</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/31/flader-having-fun/#comment-124</guid>
					<description>It seems to me that your laughter was a little pre-mature.  Dummy has every right to get his nose into the claim if he has observed that his partner is concealing a revoke and trying to get away with it.  See Law 72 B4.  As it turns out, the dummy was out of place, but it didn't have to be so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that your laughter was a little pre-mature.  Dummy has every right to get his nose into the claim if he has observed that his partner is concealing a revoke and trying to get away with it.  See Law 72 B4.  As it turns out, the dummy was out of place, but it didn&#8217;t have to be so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Maribeth</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/31/flader-having-fun/#comment-39</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2005/12/31/flader-having-fun/#comment-39</guid>
					<description>Perhaps this poor soul was confused between active ethics and partnership harmony. Seriously doubt he will make the same mistake twice, now that he knows the rule:&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this poor soul was confused between active ethics and partnership harmony. Seriously doubt he will make the same mistake twice, now that he knows the rule:&gt;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
