Comments on: Probe or Blast? http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/ Contract Bridge Themes with a Midwest Accent! Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:54:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Brad Carmichael http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-30 Brad Carmichael Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:59:23 +0000 http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-30 This should be treated as a game force in spite of the heart void. Since 3S is invitational without prior discussion, I think 3D is best This should be treated as a game force in spite of the heart void. Since 3S is invitational without prior discussion, I think 3D is best

]]> By: Nik http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-29 Nik Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:59:02 +0000 http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-29 3S. In my system this is FG. Partner can bid 3n, cue bid or raise to 4S (low singleton is ok). For the record, I dont think 3n will play better than 4M. There could be too many problems.I'm not even thinking to play below game. Playing std system I'll just brutally jump to 4S. 3S. In my system this is FG. Partner can bid 3n, cue bid or raise to 4S (low singleton is ok). For the record, I dont think 3n will play better than 4M. There could be too many problems.I’m not even thinking to play below game. Playing std system I’ll just brutally jump to 4S.

]]> By: bernie miller http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-28 bernie miller Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:58:43 +0000 http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-28 3d, might be misfit, but too good to invite. i'll raise 3s to 4; think over 3h (prob. pass) think over 3n; pass 4h. 3d, might be misfit, but too good to invite. i’ll raise 3s to 4; think over 3h (prob. pass) think over 3n; pass 4h.

]]> By: Phil Warden http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-27 Phil Warden Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:58:19 +0000 http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-27 I think 3S is clear. With partners opening 1H with hands 'too good for a weak two' I might be lucky to have play for 3. I think 3S is clear. With partners opening 1H with hands ‘too good for a weak two’ I might be lucky to have play for 3.

]]> By: Mohan http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-26 Mohan Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:57:32 +0000 http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/01/01/probe-or-blast/#comment-26 IWOULD DOWNGRADE MY HAND I BID 3S IWOULD DOWNGRADE MY HAND

I BID 3S

]]>