<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Level Play</title>
	<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/09/06/high-level-play/</link>
	<description>Contract Bridge Themes with a Midwest Accent!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Justin Lall</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/09/06/high-level-play/#comment-92</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/09/06/high-level-play/#comment-92</guid>
					<description>LHO would at least squirm a little if he had 8 hearts and a spade void white/red after you bid 4S. He would DEFINITELY squirm in passout after 5S came around to him. RHO also may be reluctant to bid 5H with Kx of spades. This is very much a table feel type of situation, but I think I'd play for the drop if LHO gave no table action. 

As for opening, the hand seems fine on playing strength for a 3S opener, but I'm a junior :) The hand is very offensive and wants partner to raise with a good fitting hand, and also wants to preempt the opponents. I don't like passing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LHO would at least squirm a little if he had 8 hearts and a spade void white/red after you bid 4S. He would DEFINITELY squirm in passout after 5S came around to him. RHO also may be reluctant to bid 5H with Kx of spades. This is very much a table feel type of situation, but I think I&#8217;d play for the drop if LHO gave no table action. </p>
<p>As for opening, the hand seems fine on playing strength for a 3S opener, but I&#8217;m a junior :) The hand is very offensive and wants partner to raise with a good fitting hand, and also wants to preempt the opponents. I don&#8217;t like passing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brad C</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/09/06/high-level-play/#comment-88</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oldprofbridge.com/2006/09/06/high-level-play/#comment-88</guid>
					<description>I would have expected the opponents to bid 6H and not risk giving up a potential vulnerable game if one hand were void in spades. I play for the drop. By the way I think you boxed yourself by not opening the bidding. I think the least of all evils is a 2S opening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have expected the opponents to bid 6H and not risk giving up a potential vulnerable game if one hand were void in spades. I play for the drop. By the way I think you boxed yourself by not opening the bidding. I think the least of all evils is a 2S opening.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
