Comments on: Bidding Judgment Solution http://oldprofbridge.com/2007/04/30/bidding-judgment-solution/ Contract Bridge Themes with a Midwest Accent! Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:54:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Moose http://oldprofbridge.com/2007/04/30/bidding-judgment-solution/#comment-1136 Moose Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:59:24 +0000 http://oldprofbridge.com/2007/04/30/bidding-judgment-solution/#comment-1136 http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~jeff/knr.cgi?hand=KJ7+765+AKQ5+K76 K&R (KJ7 765 AKQ5 K76) = 15.45 DK = 16- http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~jeff/knr.cgi?hand=9864+KQ2+J632+Q8 K&R (9864 KQ2 J632 Q8) = 5.75 DK = 7- According to the Kaplan and Rubens (and Danny Kleinman) hand evaluator on Jeff Goldsmith's website, acceptance is marginal, but perhaps within the scope of the "Invite Seldom", "Accept Often" philosophy of avoiding 2NT. The evaluations of the "invite" strongly suggest partner was using another methodology. http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~jeff/knr.cgi?hand=KJ7+765+AKQ5+K76
K&R (KJ7 765 AKQ5 K76) = 15.45
DK = 16-

http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~jeff/knr.cgi?hand=9864+KQ2+J632+Q8
K&R (9864 KQ2 J632 Q8) = 5.75
DK = 7-

According to the Kaplan and Rubens (and Danny Kleinman) hand evaluator on Jeff Goldsmith’s website, acceptance is marginal, but perhaps within the scope of the “Invite Seldom”, “Accept Often” philosophy of avoiding 2NT. The evaluations of the “invite” strongly suggest partner was using another methodology.

]]>