<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Very Unusual Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/</link>
	<description>Contract Bridge Themes with a Midwest Accent!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Monsour</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-9695</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Monsour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-9695</guid>
		<description>I would find it difficult to pass this hand at the table, and I pass out far more than my share of deals. I sympathize with the desire to open above the 1 level. 2H neither expresses the hand’s values nor shuts out the spades, but 4H feels like too much. (Note that LHO may be able to double 4H for penalty on this particular auction, depending on your opponents’ agreements, since he is a passed hand. He isn’t going ot double 3H for penalty.) I think 3H has a lot going for it. If partner bids 3NT, I will bid 4C next. (That’s the vig…we may find clubs.) If partner passes, I suspect we weren’t making 4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would find it difficult to pass this hand at the table, and I pass out far more than my share of deals. I sympathize with the desire to open above the 1 level. 2H neither expresses the hand’s values nor shuts out the spades, but 4H feels like too much. (Note that LHO may be able to double 4H for penalty on this particular auction, depending on your opponents’ agreements, since he is a passed hand. He isn’t going ot double 3H for penalty.) I think 3H has a lot going for it. If partner bids 3NT, I will bid 4C next. (That’s the vig…we may find clubs.) If partner passes, I suspect we weren’t making 4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>I think the choices are pass and 4H.  1H gives me too many impossible decisions later in the hand.  The opponents are extremely likely to bid spades.  What do I do when it goes 1H-1S-2H-3S-4H-4S-P-P-?.  I lean toward opening 4H here because (A) it might make, (B) at least that way I won&#039;t have to play 5H and (B) if it&#039;s going for a number, the opponents are unlikely to be able to double - not the case if I go slower.  I think these same arguments make pass reasonable, but 4H makes you a tougher opponent to play against, and I like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the choices are pass and 4H.  1H gives me too many impossible decisions later in the hand.  The opponents are extremely likely to bid spades.  What do I do when it goes 1H-1S-2H-3S-4H-4S-P-P-?.  I lean toward opening 4H here because (A) it might make, (B) at least that way I won&#8217;t have to play 5H and (B) if it&#8217;s going for a number, the opponents are unlikely to be able to double &#8211; not the case if I go slower.  I think these same arguments make pass reasonable, but 4H makes you a tougher opponent to play against, and I like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOJO</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>MOJO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>I asked two other players their opinion. They both liked 4H, but didn&#039;t really give their reasons. There ought to be a better way to bid the hand than blasting into 4H, yet it has a lot going for it and my first thought was that is a what I would bid.

The more I think about it, however, I like 1H. Let&#039;s try and find out more about all the hands. If you were in an earlier position, then you&#039;d have to be worried about spades. Both opps have had a chance to act and I do have some defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked two other players their opinion. They both liked 4H, but didn&#8217;t really give their reasons. There ought to be a better way to bid the hand than blasting into 4H, yet it has a lot going for it and my first thought was that is a what I would bid.</p>
<p>The more I think about it, however, I like 1H. Let&#8217;s try and find out more about all the hands. If you were in an earlier position, then you&#8217;d have to be worried about spades. Both opps have had a chance to act and I do have some defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOJO</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>MOJO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Do you have any agreements with partner as to what 3H would be (in fourth seat)? I&#039;m not too afraid of spades, partner probably has at least four, but am making a bid that might get us to game. The club fit is crucial, but I&#039;m not sure how to address that. 1H is okay, but if partner bids 1S, now what do you rebid? 4H has a lot going for it, too -- let them figure out what to lead and how to defend.

Good problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any agreements with partner as to what 3H would be (in fourth seat)? I&#8217;m not too afraid of spades, partner probably has at least four, but am making a bid that might get us to game. The club fit is crucial, but I&#8217;m not sure how to address that. 1H is okay, but if partner bids 1S, now what do you rebid? 4H has a lot going for it, too &#8212; let them figure out what to lead and how to defend.</p>
<p>Good problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew b</title>
		<link>http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>drew b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldprofbridge.com/2008/07/31/a-very-unusual-problem/#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>I certainly consider bidding to be automatic--in my opinion it would be awfully pessimistic to pass out this collection worrying that the opponents will start bidding spades.  Game is likely and even slam is possible, tho it may not be biddable if it is there.  I&#039;d just open one heart and count myself unlucky if I end up with a big minus score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly consider bidding to be automatic&#8211;in my opinion it would be awfully pessimistic to pass out this collection worrying that the opponents will start bidding spades.  Game is likely and even slam is possible, tho it may not be biddable if it is there.  I&#8217;d just open one heart and count myself unlucky if I end up with a big minus score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

